InnerCircleIDN

EDEN/USDT - Breakout in Progress! After a long downtrend and consolidation phase, EDEN is finally showing signs of reversal with a breakout from the falling wedge pattern on the 1H chart. Volume is starting to pick up - a good signal for potential continuation. Fibonacci Targets: 0.46 → first resistance 0.57 → 1.272 extension 0.66 → main target (1.618) 0.71 → extended target (1.786) As long as price holds above 0.38-0.40, the bullish momentum remains valid. A break below 0.34 would invalidate the setup. "Patience during the dip, confidence during the lift." #EDEN #CryptoAnaly #BreakoutSetup #tradingView #Binance

EDEN / USDT Begins to Rebound! After a prolonged downward trend, EDEN is finally showing early signs of a reversal. The higher low pattern on the 1H timeframe indicates buyers are starting to enter. Potential upside targets: $0.48 (first resistance) $0.54 - $0.60 (key zone) Further targets: $0.80 - $0.90 As long as the price can hold above $0.38, the short-term bullish trend remains intact. Is this the time for EDEN to stage another major rally? #EDEN #CryptoAnalysis #Altcoin

🔥 EDEN / USDT Analysis 🔥 Market often moves in cycles of fear and greed. 👉 “Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful.” 📉 EDEN has been consolidating under a downtrend line. 📈 A breakout could open the door for a strong reversal move. Key levels to watch: 🎯 0.4359 (breakout point) 🎯 0.54 🎯 0.70 🎯 0.90 ⚡ Strategy: Wait for breakout confirmation. Panic selling from others can be your best entry opportunity. #EDEN #CryptoTrading #BinanceSquare

EDEN Better than ONDO 🔹 1. Price & Movement ONDO: $0.8814 (down -0.09%) EDEN: $0.4177 (up +2.63%) ➡️ EDEN currently looks more bullish in the short term as it is rising, while ONDO is stagnant/slightly down. 🔹 2. Market Cap ONDO: $2.78 billion EDEN: $76.80 million ➡️ ONDO is much larger and more established. EDEN is still smaller, making it riskier but also has the potential to provide large returns if it grows successfully. 🔹 3. 24-Hour Volume ONDO: $173.90 million EDEN: $652.47 million ➡️ Interestingly, despite EDEN's smaller market cap, its trading volume is higher than ONDO's. This indicates that market sentiment for EDEN is hot and heavily traded. 🔹 4. Supply ONDO: 3.15B circulating (maximum supply unclear) EDEN: 183.87M circulating (maximum supply 1B) ➡️ EDEN still has a large supply gap going forward, which could impact token inflation. ➡️ ONDO's maximum supply is unclear, meaning there could be a risk of additional issuance. 🔹 5. Age & Track Record ONDO: Since January 18, 2024 → almost a year old, proven to be resilient. EDEN: Just launched September 28, 2025 → still very new, high risk. 🔹 6. CMC Ranking ONDO: #39 (top tier, relatively safe & stable). EDEN: #426 (still small, high risk-high reward). 📊 Conclusion ONDO → Safer, large capitalization, well-established, suitable for investors seeking stability and lower risk. EDEN → New, small capitalization but high volume, bullish sentiment, suitable for investors willing to take high risks for the potential of large profits. 👉 Strategy: If you're looking for long-term security, ONDO is better. If you're speculative and want quick profits, EDEN is more promising, but the risk is high. #ONDO #EDEN

EDEN Better than ONDO 🔹 1. Price & Movement ONDO: $0.8814 (down -0.09%) EDEN: $0.4177 (up +2.63%) ➡️ EDEN currently looks more bullish in the short term as it is rising, while ONDO is stagnant/slightly down. 🔹 2. Market Cap ONDO: $2.78 billion EDEN: $76.80 million ➡️ ONDO is much larger and more established. EDEN is still smaller, making it riskier but also has the potential to provide large returns if it grows successfully. 🔹 3. 24-Hour Volume ONDO: $173.90 million EDEN: $652.47 million ➡️ Interestingly, despite EDEN's smaller market cap, its trading volume is higher than ONDO's. This indicates that market sentiment for EDEN is hot and heavily traded. 🔹 4. Supply ONDO: 3.15B circulating (maximum supply unclear) EDEN: 183.87M circulating (maximum supply 1B) ➡️ EDEN still has a large supply gap going forward, which could impact token inflation. ➡️ ONDO's maximum supply is unclear, meaning there could be a risk of additional issuance. 🔹 5. Age & Track Record ONDO: Since January 18, 2024 → almost a year old, proven to be resilient. EDEN: Just launched September 28, 2025 → still very new, high risk. 🔹 6. CMC Ranking ONDO: #39 (top tier, relatively safe & stable). EDEN: #426 (still small, high risk-high reward). 📊 Conclusion ONDO → Safer, large capitalization, well-established, suitable for investors seeking stability and lower risk. EDEN → New, small capitalization but high volume, bullish sentiment, suitable for investors willing to take high risks for the potential of large profits. 👉 Strategy: If you're looking for long-term security, ONDO is better. If you're speculative and want quick profits, EDEN is more promising, but the risk is high. #ONDO #EDEN

OpenEden's EDEN token is here Backed by the RWA narrative, with vault farming, Binance airdrops, and a unique HODLers Bonus that rewards patience Circulating supply at launch? Only 18% Scarcity + strong community = bullish vibes #Crypto #DeFi #RWA #EDENtoken #Bullish

TAOUSDT Analysis (1D timeframe) Currently, TAO is trading around $298, showing a slight decline of -1.02%. On the chart, we can see a falling wedge / descending triangle pattern forming, with strong horizontal support around the $295-300 zone. The projection indicates a potential breakout to the upside, with a measured move target of around +54.8%, which could bring the price toward the $460-480 range if momentum builds. As long as TAO holds above the key support level, the bullish breakout scenario remains valid. However, a breakdown below support would invalidate this setup and may trigger further downside. Key levels to watch: Support: $295-300 Resistance: $365-425 Breakout target: $460-480

1. Widespread adoption of DeFi & CeFi → more DEXs, CEXs, and financial applications using Pyth price feeds (because they're fast and cheap). Institutions & governments → collaboration with large institutions (e.g., the US Department of Commerce) increases credibility. 3. Multi-chain expansion → the more blockchain integrations, the greater the demand for data → higher fees for publishers and stakers. 4. Active staking & governance → the PYTH token gains strong utility (staking, fee sharing, voting), driving demand. 5. Global crypto market revival → if the bull market returns, demand for data oracles will increase → Pyth's position as a next-generation oracle will become more prominent. Bottom line: Bullish if Pyth succeeds in becoming the standard oracle for "the price of everything" in on-chain finance.

I used the latest market data and key events: a price of around $1.18–$1.27 and a circulating supply of ~351.3 million RUNE. THORChain is also dealing with a debt issue of ~$200 million (planned conversion to equity tokens/restructuring) that impacts risk and liquidity. Basic assumptions (used in calculations): Circulating supply (≈) = 351,300,000 RUNE. The current benchmark price is estimated at $1.27 (an example for calculating the current market cap). There are solvency/restructuring issues (≈ $200 million in debt) that increase short-term uncertainty. Conversion example — current market cap (illustration): 351,300,000 × $1.27 = 351,300,000 + (351,300,000 × 0.27) 351,300,000 × 0.27 = 94,851,000 ⇒ market cap ≈ $446,151,000. (Check price and supply sources for rounding). --- Price projection (3 scenarios) > Note: I also include an implied market cap for each target = target price × 351,300,000. 1) Optimistic Scenario (adoption + reputation recovery) Trigger assumptions: successful debt conversion without harming RUNE holders, increased integrations and swap volume, restored trust, surge in TVL and LP. Price Target (12–36 months): $8 – $20 Implied market cap $8 → 351,300,000 × 8 = $2,810,400,000. Implied market cap $20 → 351,300,000 × 20 = $7,026,000,000. Probability (subjective): ~15–25% (needs many positive things to happen). Short Rationale: RUNE could be valued as critical cross-chain infrastructure if swap volume and TVL grow rapidly. 2) Moderate Scenario (slow recovery/stability) Assumptions: restructuring is underway, services are gradually restored, volumes are slowly increasing, but regulation and competition remain pressing. Price Target (12–36 months): $2 – $6 Implied market cap $2 → $702,600,000. Implied market cap $6 → $2,107,800,000. Probability: ~45–60%. Rationale: Consumers and LPs gradually returning; the token is still far from its ATH, with room for upside if solvency issues don't destroy trust. 3) Pessimistic Scenario (loss of trust/regulation/liquidity) Assumptions: The restructuring fails or is highly detrimental to token holders, strict regulation, or a security incident/large LP withdrawal. Price target (6–24 months): $0.30 – $1.00 (or lower) Implied market cap $0.30 → 351,300,000 × 0.30 = $105,390,000. Implied market cap $1.00 → $351,300,000. Probability: ~20–35%. Rationale: Solvency and reputation issues could drive liquidity outflows. (Market data sources and restructuring/delay events: CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, Cointelegraph, Messari — see news summary on servicing whales and $200M debt conversion plan). --- Practical recommendations/risk management rules 1. Position sizing (conservative advice): No more than 1–3% of total investment portfolio for speculative allocations like RUNE; If aggressive, limit to a maximum of 5%. 2. Logical entry points (based on a moderate scenario): buy incrementally in the $0.8–$1.8 range (dollar-cost averaging). 3. Stop-loss & take-profit: Conservative example — initial stop-loss 30–50% of entry price (depending on tolerance), gradual take-profit targets depending on the scenario (e.g., sell partially at $2–$6, then sell again at $8+). 4. Checkpoints (should be monitored weekly/monthly): Updates on $200M debt conversion & governance decisions. Total swap volume & 24-hour spot volume (rising indicates adoption). Total RUNE pooled / TVL & number of active validator nodes (determines security & liquidity). Legal/regulatory news and security audits. --- What can I build next (immediately) Pick one and I'll work on it now: 1. Create a numerical projection model (simple Monte-Carlo or deterministic scenario) that generates a probability curve and estimated date (I'm assuming supply and volume). 2. A concise dashboard (table) showing target price → implied market cap → % increase from current price. 3. A news and metrics notification checklist (a checklist format that you can monitor weekly).