analysis by سیگنال برتر about Stock وسینا on 6/14/2025

#Dara_Com 📌 Report from the annual Assembly of Dar -e -Nim and Micro shareholders' protest against the performance of the marketer and the policies of Dara 1: The second part of the Annual Financial Intermediary Fund (Dara 1) was accompanied by the explicit and protest criticism of micro -shareholders. The main focus of these protests was the fund's marketing performance, the lack of a panel price gap with the net asset value (NAV), and the continued receipt of significant fees from the fund's resources. The protesters said that despite two years since the marketing of the marketer and receiving more than 2 billion tomans, the status of the market to NAV was not significantly different from the pre -marketer. They believed that the lack of a marketer to revoke the fund's units and shrinking it was due to the effort to maintain fees; While the refinery box has decreased with the cancellation of the units, the price gap between the panel and NAV has decreased. Another critical case was the decision of the Assembly to increase the marketing fee, despite the poor performance of the past two years. The shareholders also raised questions about the lack of use of these resources to revoke units and liquidity management, pointing to the volume of bank deposits to about $ 5 billion at a low interest rate. Other other protests were the purchase of Sina Bank shares and the change of fundraising portfolio of the fund before the market price approached NAV. According to the shareholders, conditions must first be provided for investors to decide on the price or exit of the fund at prices close to NAV, then reforming the asset composition. In response, the director of the fund stated that in the current situation there is neither the resources needed to revoke the units nor the possibility of selling shares to reduce the price gap with NAV. However, shareholders believed that there were opportunities for sale in these two years and did not expect sales in heavy queues; Rather, they believed that the unwillingness to reduce the volume of the fund and maintain fees had prevented the marketers from doing so. @Chanelvip20